OpenSim
/
OpenSimMirror
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Use SendTransferAbort in a more sensible place

avinationmerge
Tom Grimshaw 2010-07-03 09:22:58 -07:00
parent e4739523d3
commit 4cd5e64231
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
OpenSim/Region/ClientStack/LindenUDP/LLClientView.cs
View File

@ -11511,12 +11511,10 @@ namespace OpenSim.Region.ClientStack.LindenUDP
// m_log.DebugFormat("[CLIENT]: {0} requesting asset {1}", Name, requestID);
if (!m_assetService.Get(requestID.ToString(), transferRequest, AssetReceived))
{
//We need to send a TransferAbort here, so the client doesn't wait forever for the asset,
//which causes it to not request any more for a while. Which is bad.
SendTransferAbort(transferRequest);
}
//Note, the bool returned from the below function is useless since it is always false.
m_assetService.Get(requestID.ToString(), transferRequest, AssetReceived);
}
/// <summary>
@ -11565,8 +11563,10 @@ namespace OpenSim.Region.ClientStack.LindenUDP
}
//m_log.DebugFormat("[ASSET CACHE]: Asset transfer request for asset which is {0} already known to be missing. Dropping", requestID);
// FIXME: We never tell the client about assets which do not exist when requested by this transfer mechanism, which can't be right.
//We need to send a TransferAbort here, so the client doesn't wait forever for the asset,
//which causes it to not request any more for a while. Which is bad.
SendTransferAbort(transferRequest);
return;
}