Kind of fixed Melanie's "Exception(sql)" correction
Throwing an Ex. with SQL command in the message looks weird, this is a bit better, but I'm still not sure if that's the proper way to handle. Also, there is a catch one level up, so is this one necessary?soprefactor
parent
e4b8d76b10
commit
527a257b9f
|
@ -150,9 +150,9 @@ namespace OpenSim.Data
|
|||
{
|
||||
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch
|
||||
catch(Exception e)
|
||||
{
|
||||
throw new Exception(sql);
|
||||
throw new Exception(e.Message + " in SQL: " + sql);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue