Kind of fixed Melanie's "Exception(sql)" correction

Throwing an Ex. with SQL command in the message looks weird,
this is a bit better, but I'm still not sure if that's the
proper way to handle.  Also, there is a catch one level up,
so is this one necessary?
soprefactor
AlexRa 2010-05-19 17:00:02 +03:00
parent e4b8d76b10
commit 527a257b9f
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -150,9 +150,9 @@ namespace OpenSim.Data
{
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
catch
catch(Exception e)
{
throw new Exception(sql);
throw new Exception(e.Message + " in SQL: " + sql);
}
}
}