If the C# column can't be found in the positionMap (but the line can),
use the map immediately after it while correcting for the offset,
unless that results in an LSL position before the previous LSL position
in the positionMap.
The idea behind this heuristic is that in most, if not all cases C#
consumes more characters than LSL (for example LSL_Types.LSLInteger
instead of just 'integer').
Thus if the distance between the columns of two markers differ in
the C# and LSL file, the distance in the C# file will be larger.
Moreover, we can assume that every time this happens we will have
a marker at the beginning of the longer 'keyword', because those
keywords were generated by us in the first place.
For example:
C#: LSL_Types.LSLInteger f2(LSL_Types.LSLString s)
^ ^
1 2
will always have markers at the beginning of the long keywords
'LSL_Types.LSLInteger' and 'LSL_Types.LSLString'.
If an error is generated in between (for example at the beginning
of the function name 'f2') then the correct position is found
by using an offset relative to 2 rather than 1.
Note that a case where this isn't working correctly is
when the user adds extra spaces. For example:
LSL: integer f2( string s)
would still use the start of 'string' as reference and
then go backwards 3 characters only because the corresponding
C# still looks like
C#: LSL_Types.LSLInteger f2(LSL_Types.LSLString s)
^ ^
only 3 chars difference
and the reported error at 'f2' would be here:
LSL: integer f2( string s)
^
This can only be fixed by generating a mapping for 'f2' itself, or
generating a mapping whenever the amount of spaces is changed.
When a compile error reports a colum/error that is not an exact
match in the positionMap dictionary, the last position in the
map with a line number and position before the reported error
should be returned.
The old code had the following problems:
1) It returns l,c - which are line and column of the C# file, not LSL.
2) It doesn't set l to 'line' when the map has an entry with 'line'.
3) It sorts the map without taking columns into account, which may
result in a random order of the columns. With my mono implementation
the columns were reversed in order.
For example, if the map contains the following lines:
99,5,49,10
100,30,50,10
100,40,1,0
101,5,51,10
and a translation of 100,35 was requested,
then the old code would compare '100' with the keys in
the first column - setting l to that key while it is
smaller. Hence, l is set to 99.
Then it finds the key 100 and doesn't update l.
Because of the reversed sort order, it first compares
the column 35 with 40, finding that it is smaller
and therefore it stops; returning 99,1 instead of finding
the correct 100,30 entry and returning 50,10.
This patch causes 50,10 to be returned.
The remaining problems after this patch are:
1) The sorting might not be necessary at all.
2) The is code duplication (I fixed both instances,
but really there should be no code duplication
imho).
AvatarFlyingGroundMargin and AvatarFlyingGroundUpForce set to 5.0 and
2.0 respectively which seems to give about the same action as in SL.
Also moved force addition to before the velocity to force computation
so the upward velocity is properly applied to the avatar mass.
This is because jump statement generation was mistakenly inserting its own line without updating the csharp positions in CSCodeGenerator.
This is Aleric Inglewood's patch in http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=7195 but applied to opensim itself rather than the defunct code generation in opensim-libs. Thanks!
This patch also adds a regression test for this case from myself.
This should get around the exception reported in Mantis 7191 and 7204
by checking for the unbuilt child and rebuilding the linkset the next tick.
A warning message is output when this rebuild happens and this message is
clamped to 10 times in case there is a problem with a loop.
For some reason as yet unidentified (feedback?) a threshold above 0.4 here causes the RawVelocity to move between a lower and upper bound rather than remaining constant.
The RawVelocity increased until it triggered the threshold update, at which point it started to decrease until it again triggered the threshhold update.
This delta-v was enough to exceed the checks in ScenePresence.SendTerseUpdateToAllClients() and produce jittery avatar flight because of the fluctuating velocity.
With a threshold of 0.4 (or 0, as with ODE), the RawVelocity remains constant in BulletSim and so avatar flight becomes mostly smooth - remaining occasional glitches appear to be a result of errors in distance extraploation.
There are no obvious problems with commenting out the threshold.
Misterblue, if this is wrong or I've missed some subtlety here, please feel free to revert and/or correct.
The same considerations may or may not apply to object velocity updates.
Diva Canto