AgentUpdate packet. This fixes the problem with vehicles not moving forward
after the first up-arrow.
Code to fix a potential exception when using different IClientAPIs.
Conflicts:
OpenSim/Region/ClientStack/Linden/UDP/LLClientView.cs
If we're not receiving packets with multiple threads (m_asyncPacketHandling) then this is critical since it will limit the number of incoming UDP requests that the region can handle and affects packet loss.
If m_asyncPacketHandling then this is less critical though a long process will increase the scope for threads to race.
This is an experimental stat which may be changed.
In this new protocol, and as committed before, the viewer is not sent EnableSimulator/EstablishChildCommunication for the destination. Instead, it is sent TeleportFinish directly. TeleportFinish, in turn, makes the viewer send a UserCircuitCode packet followed by CompleteMovementIntoRegion packet. These 2 packets tend to occur one after the other almost immediately to the point that when CMIR arrives the client is not even connected yet and that packet is ignored (there might have been some race conditions here before); then the viewer sends CMIR again within 5-8 secs. But the delay between them may be higher in busier regions, which may lead to race conditions.
This commit improves the process so there are are no race conditions at the destination. CompleteMovement (triggered by the viewer) waits until Update has been sent from the origin. Update, in turn, waits until there is a *root* scene presence -- so making sure CompleteMovement has run MakeRoot. In other words, there are two threadlets at the destination, one from the viewer and one from the origin region, waiting for each other to do the right thing. That makes it safe to close the agent at the origin upon return of the Update call without having to wait for callback, because we are absolutely sure that the viewer knows it is in th new region.
Note also that in the V1 protocol, the destination was getting UseCircuitCode from the viewer twice -- once on EstablishAgentCommunication and then again on TeleportFinish. The second UCC was being ignored, but it shows how we were not following the expected steps...
Revert "One last thing before I stop on this: now not sending ES and EAC to the viewer. Looking in GridProxy, I don't see those messages in the Linden grid."
This reverts commit 1d27c9f4d1.
Revert "EXPERIMENTAL: Trying the other order -- delaying MoveAgentIntoRegion until after the departing agent is released."
This reverts commit fe2487f8d3.
Revert "EXPERIMENTAL: Switch MoveAgentIntoRegion with MakeRootAgent, to see if that eliminates the momentary position at infinity."
This reverts commit 1cb5e31716.
- The existing event to scene has been split into 2: OnAgentUpdate and OnAgentCameraUpdate, to better reflect the two types of updates that the viewer sends. We can run one without the other, which is what happens when the avie is still but the user is camming around
- Added thresholds (as opposed to equality) to determine whether the update is significant or not. I thin these thresholds are ok, but we can play with them later
- Ignore updates of HeadRotation, which were problematic and aren't being used up stream
move around when standing on a stationary object.
Create proper linkage between BSCharacter and its actor by generating
a UpdatedProperties event the same way BSPrim does.
Added here since it was the most convenient place
Number is in the last column, "Sig. AgentUpdates" along with percentage of all AgentUpdates
Percentage largely falls over time, most cpu for processing AgentUpdates may be in UDP processing as turning this off even earlier (with "debug lludp toggle agentupdate" results in a big cpu fall
Also tidies up display.
Enabling this will stop anybody from moving on a sim, though all other updates should be unaffected.
Appears to make some cpu difference on very basic testing with a static standing avatar (though not all that much).
Need to see the results with much higher av numbers.
This appears to improve cpu usage since launching a new thread is more expensive than performing a small amount of inline logic.
However, needs testing at scale.