However, it looks like we should retain SP.ParentID since it's much easier to use that in places where another thread could change ParentPart to null.
Otherwise one has to clumsily put ParentPart in a reference, etc. to avoid a race.
from previous commit which sort out which iterator is used are left
intact. A discussion is needed as to what constitutes an avatar vs a
ScenePresence.
the 3 iteration functions so more of them are using the correct
iteration for the action they are performing. The 3 iterators that seem
to fit all actions within OpenSim at this time are:
ForEachAvatar: Perform an action on all avatars (root presences)
ForEachClient: Perform an action on all clients (root or child clients)
ForEachRootClient: Perform an action on all clients that have an avatar
There are still a dozen places or so calling the old
ForEachScenePresence that will take a little more refactoring to
eliminate.
Remove the too coarse CanEditParcel method in favor of a CanEditParcelProperties
method that takes a GroupPowers argument to specify what action is to be
taken. Also, make the method to set parcel data much more granular. Permissions
in a deeded setting should now work.
Remove the too coarse CanEditParcel method in favor of a CanEditParcelProperties
method that takes a GroupPowers argument to specify what action is to be
taken. Also, make the method to set parcel data much more granular. Permissions
in a deeded setting should now work.
* It does this by tweaking the throttles on child agent connection to a megaregion and multiplying the land throttle by 50. (various bit and byte magic ensue)
* While, I doubt this will cause terrain crater sized potholes.. since it actually increases the bandwidth available for land in child regions when MegaRegions area active, more testing would be good.
* This, in theory, also shouldn't cause missing objects in child regions.. because all objects are in the root region anyway. As I said, more testing would be good.
Melanie