Using the RemoteAdmin API to close then recreate a region would fail if the estate name had not changed. If the estate name /was/ changed then the existing estate would be renamed rather than a new one being created. The problem really arose from a lack of distinction in the data storage layer between creating new estates and loading existing ones.
This is controlled by the CreateDefaultAvatarEntries switch in the [UserAccountService] section of config-include/Stnadalone.ini
This is left as false in grid mode
Viewer 2 no longer contains the default avatar assets (i.e. "Ruth") that would appear if the user had insufficient body part/clothing entries.
Instead, avatars always appear as a cloud, which is a very bad experience for out-of-the-box OpenSim.
Default is currently off. My intention is to switch it on for standalone shortly.
This is not particularly flexible as "Ruth" is hardcoded, but this can change in the future, in co-ordination with the existing RemoteAdmin capabilities.
Need to fix creation of suitable entries for users created as estate owners on standalone.
Avatars still appear with spooky empty eyes, need to see if we can address this.
This commit adds a "Default Iris" to the library (thanks to Eirynne Sieyes from http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=1461) which can be used.
If we do this, then viewer 3 crashes when we try and rez a script directly in an attachment's prim inventory.
Sending an empty file name was already being done if the prim's inventory had never been touched.
Now we always do that if there are no items in that inventory.
Hopefully addresses the remaining point in http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=5644
Viewer 2/3 will sometimes attempt to rewear attachments, even though they have already been attached during the main login process.
This change ignores those attempts.
This stops script failures during login, as the rewearing was racing with the script startup code.
It might also help with attachments being abnormally put into deleted state.
Hopefully resolves some more of http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=5644
As far as I can see, this is only invoked by a PUT request to ObjectHandlers, which is not being used anyway.
Invoking attachments code at this point is probably inappropriate since it would still be invoked when the client entered the scene.
Being commented to simplify analysis of attachments issues. Can be uncommented when in use.
Also, small tweak to lock and log removal of a SOG from the SceneObjectGroupsByLocalPartID collection in SceneGraph.GetGroupByPrim() if an inconsistency is found.
This is the message sent to the client when the object is returned.
We were sending byte[0] in the binary bucket. This didn't kill viewer 1 but did terminate viewer 3 (don't know about viewer 2).
So sending "\0" instead.
This is to address http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=5683
Attach and detach packets are processed asynchronously when received from a viewer.
Bugs like http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=5644 indicate that in some situations (such as attaching/detaching entire folders of objects at once), there are race conditions between these threads.
Since multiple data structures need to be updated on attach/detach, it's not enough to lock the individual collections.
Therefore, this commit introduces a new IScenePresence.AttachmentsSyncLock which add/remove operations lock on.
Leaving them at UUID.Zero meant that when a viewer 2 logged into a region that had been freshly created, it received UUID.Zero for these textures, and hence display the land as plain white.
On a simulator restart, the problem would go away since when the database adapators loaded the new region settings, RegionSettings itself has code to use default textures instead of UUID.Zero.
This commit resolves the problem by saving the default texture UUIDs instead of Zero.
However, we currently have to do this in a roundabout way by resaving once the RegionSettings have been created by the database for the first time. This needless complexity should be addressed.
This change will also have the effect of replacing any existing UUID.Zero terrain textures with the default ones.
However, this shouldn't have any effect since the UUID.Zeros were already being replaced in memory with those same UUIDs.
Kevin Houlihan