From pure code inspection, it looks like the uuid gatherer may get most asset uuids because the scene object serializer naively pulls non-root parts from all contained scene objects into one mega-object. However, root part uuids may well still be missing, and there may be other odd artifacts from this bug.
It appears that storing the size of the coalescence and the offsets is redundant, since one can work out this information from the position data already in the scene object groups.
to the entity update queue. The number of property packets can
become significant when selecting/deselecting large numbers of
objects.
This is experimental code.
This structure matches the existing one for SceneObjects and will allow code to be reused by the uuid gatherer, other tests, etc.
Test is not yet fully implemented due to a bug in rezzing coalesced objects where they all get the same name as the item.
Only one object should get the same name as the item, which appears to be the one selected last when the the objects were coalesced in the first place.
This bug will be addressed shortly.
This should happen if the client supplies a task ID with the RezObject call.
The rez goes through the same code as llRezObject(), so the same perms are applied.
Rotation isn't yet preserved, this should be fixed shortly.
This updates prim counts correctly if an object is moved by something other than an avatar (e.g. scripts, region modules)
Create TestMoveOwnerObject() regression test for this case.
However, the calls to the land management module to record prims need to remain, since they were also being used to return owner object lists, etc.
This is probably why prim counts were being done there in the first place.
This applies to adding/removing estate users, groups, managers and bans.
This is the application of the AllEstates_0.5.patch from http://opensimulator.org/mantis/view.php?id=5420
Thanks very much, Snoopy!
WARNING!!!!!
You can TAKE them, but you can't REZ them again. Only the first of the contained
objects will rez, the rest is inaccessible until rezzing them is implemented.
Also, rotations are not explicitly stored. This MAY work. Or not.
Added a prim counts test to reinforce this - shift-copy was no incrementing prim count. This will sometime become a basic scene test.
New code needs to be refactored so we just call SceneGraph.AddSceneObject(). This will happen in the near future.
With this, basic owner prim counts on a single parcel appear to be working fine (with the same previous existing taint calls as used by the land management module).
More work to do.
To do this, a new SceneObjectGroupsByFullID index in SceneGraph which just index's prims by their root part UUID, in order to avoid the inefficiency of filtering existing lists.
Existing callers to SceneGraph.ForEachSOG() did not fail due to the multiple per SOG action executions - they were probably just much less efficient.
Code suggests that no callers expected ForEachSOG() to execute actions on sog multiple times
In order to pass ILandObject into IClientAPI.SendLandProperties(), had to push ILandObject and IPrimCounts into OpenSim.Framework from OpenSim.Region.Framework.Interfaces, in order to avoid ci
Counts are showing odd behaviour at the moment, this will be addressed shortly.
OnParcelPrimCountAdd had the wrong semantics for the PrimCountModule - it was invoked for every entity in the scene, not just new ones, which would screw up the untainted count.
Extend automated test for this scenario.
This should resolve issues where the creator for rezzed objects was being shown as "Unknown user" where previous behaviour was to show the OSP resolved account.
This is being done by parsing the serialized objects and updating the CreatorID if no CreationData exists. This operation might be expensive for sculpties where the sculpt texture is inlined with the object data. Will just have to see.
This relies on the IAR streaming inventory data before asset data (as is currently the case). Will need to introduce more stringent checks for file order on loading (much like JAR zips must start with the manifest file).
This is for IAR loading only. Tests updated to check this behaviour.
child agents in neighbor regions. This means you can extend
the view on a simulator beyond the default 3x3 regions.
This uses a region default draw distance and should be
replaced at some point by the avatar specified draw distance.
That will require more careful, dynamic recomputation of child
agents every time the draw distance changes.
WARNING: this is experimental and has known instabilities. specifically
all regions "within site" should be running the same default draw distance
or agents will not be closed correctly.
This test was non-viable. Keeping inactive T021_TestCrossToNewRegion() around for now since it's still useful for reference purposes in constructing a future working test.
Going this extra step doesn't appear to cause any test failures.
This is arguably better for test purposes, though at some stage another method may arise which does just call AddRootAgent().
This restores a RemoveFromPhysicalScene() call in ScenePresence.CheckForBorderCrossing() when the agent has been placed in transit.
If we don't remove the agent from the physical scene, then the method continues to be called via ScenePresence.Update()
until the handover of the client between regions is completed. Since this handover can take more than 1000ms (due to the 1000ms
event queue polling response from the server), this results in the avatar pausing on the border for the entire handover period.
This allows the root prim, alone or in a set, to send it's
rotation. This fixes unsitting the avatar on sit-offsest
type teleports where the sit target is in the root prim of
a linkset.
This will show the estate for each region, along with that estate's id and the estate owner.
This is temporary because the command output might change.
This commit also converts the estate module from the old to the new region module format
once to each simulator rather than once to each region. This
should help with some of the delays caused by multiple outstanding
requests to a single service point.
The region spanning parcel shouldn't exist in this situation. If it does, when the land data is loaded it is repersisted with a local ID which comes after the ones loaded via the oar, which obliterates the oar loaded one.
Resaving the data we just loaded from the database is somewhat odd in itself (though this makes sense from the way that OAR loading was already using the same event).
Justin Clark-Casey (justincc)